The Khoisan languages ( ; also Khoesan or Khoesaan) are a number of African languages once classified together, originally by Joseph Greenberg.[Greenberg, Joseph H. 1955. ''Studies in African Linguistic Classification.'' New Haven: Compass Publishing Company. (Reprints, with minor corrections, a series of eight articles published in the ''Southwestern Journal of Anthropology'' from 1949 to 1954.)][ Khoisan is defined as those languages that have click languages and do not belong to other African language families. For much of the 20th century, they were thought to be genealogically related to each other, but this is no longer accepted. They are now held to comprise three distinct language family and two .
]
All but two Khoisan languages are indigenous to southern Africa; these are classified into three language families. The Khoe languages appears to have migrated to southern Africa not long before the Bantu expansion.[ Ethnically, their speakers are the Khoekhoe and the San people (Bushmen). Two languages of eastern Africa, those of the Sandawe people and Hadza people, were originally also classified as Khoisan, although their speakers are ethnically neither Khoekhoe nor San.
]
Before the Bantu expansion, Khoisan languages, or languages like them, were likely spread throughout southern and eastern Africa. They are currently restricted to the Kalahari Desert, primarily in Namibia and Botswana, and to the Rift Valley in central Tanzania.
Most of the languages are endangered, and several are moribund or extinct. Most have no written record. The only widespread Khoisan language is Khoekhoe (also known as Khoekhoegowab, Nàmá or Damara) of Namibia, Botswana and South Africa, with a quarter of a million speakers; Sandawe language in Tanzania is second in number with some 40–80,000, some monolingual; and the ǃKung language of the northern Kalahari spoken by some 16,000 or so people. Language use is quite strong among the 20,000 speakers of Naro language, half of whom speak it as a second language.
Khoisan languages are best known for their use of as . These are typically written with characters such as ǃ and Palatal click. Clicks are quite versatile as consonants, as they involve two articulations of the tongue which can operate partially independently. Consequently, the languages with the greatest numbers of consonants in the world are Khoisan. The Juǀʼhoan language has 48 click consonants among nearly as many non-click consonants, strident vowel and pharyngealized vowels, and four tones. The Taa language and ǂHõã languages are even more complex.
Validity
Khoisan was proposed as one of the four families of African languages in Joseph Greenberg's classification (1949–1954, revised in 1963). However, linguists who study Khoisan languages reject their unity, and the name "Khoisan" is used by them as a term of convenience without any implication of linguistic validity, much as "Papuan languages" and "Australian" are.[Bonny Sands (1998) Eastern and Southern African Khoisan: Evaluating Claims of Distant Linguistic Relationships. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, Cologne] It has been suggested that the similarities of the Tuu and Kxʼa families are due to a southern African Sprachbund rather than a genealogical relationship, whereas the Khoe (or perhaps Kwadi–Khoe) family is a more recent migrant to the area, and may be related to Sandawe in East Africa.[Güldemann, Tom and Edward D. Elderkin (forthcoming) ' On external genealogical relationships of the Khoe family. ' In Brenzinger, Matthias and Christa König (eds.), Khoisan Languages and Linguistics: the Riezlern Symposium 2003. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 17. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.]
Ernst Oswald Johannes Westphal is known for his early rejection of the Khoisan language family (Starostin 2003). Bonny Sands (1998) concluded that the family is not demonstrable with current evidence. Anthony Traill at first accepted Khoisan (Traill 1986), but by 1998 concluded that it could not be demonstrated with current data and methods, rejecting it as based on a single typological criterion: the presence of clicks.[Linguistics 112 lecture, Department of Linguistics, University of the Witwatersrand, March 1998] Dimmendaal (2008) summarized the general view thus: "It has to be concluded that Greenberg's intuitions on the genetic unity of Khoisan could not be confirmed by subsequent research. Today, the few scholars working on these languages treat the three southern as independent language families that cannot or can no longer be shown to be genetically related" (p. 841). Starostin (2013) accepts a relationship between Sandawe and Khoi is plausible, as is one between Tuu and Kxʼa, but sees no indication of a relationship between Sandawe and Khoi on the one hand and Tuu and Kxʼa on the other, or between any of them and Hadza.
Janina Brutt-Griffler writes: "Given that such colonial borders were generally arbitrarily drawn, they grouped large numbers of ethnic groups that spoke many languages." She hypothesizes that this took place within efforts to prevent the spread of English during European colonization and prevent the entrance of the majority into the middle class.
Khoisan language variation
Anthony Traill noted the Khoisan languages' extreme variation.[ Despite their shared clicks, the Khoisan languages diverge significantly from each other. Traill demonstrated this linguistic diversity in the data presented in the below table. The first two columns include words from the two Khoisan , Sandawe language and Hadza language. The following three are languages from the Khoe languages, the Kxʼa family, and the Tuu languages, respectively.
]
Khoisan language words, as reported in 2005 by Britannica
|
|
tâa |
tâa á̰a |
ʘàa |
ǂnùhã |
ǃʼûĩ |
qûje |
ǁqhūũ |
ǀqhái |
tá̰a |
kxʼāhã |
Families
The branches that were once considered part of so-called Khoisan are now considered independent families, since it has not been demonstrated that they are related according to the standard comparative method.
See Khoe languages for speculations on the linguistic history of the region.
Hadza
With about 800 speakers in Tanzania, Hadza is no longer seen as a Khoisan language and appears to be unrelated to any other language. Genetically, the Hadza people are unrelated to the Khoisan peoples of Southern Africa, and their closest relatives may be among the Pygmies of Central Africa.
Sandawe
There is some indication that Sandawe (about 40,000 speakers in Tanzania) may be related to the Khoe family, such as a congruent pronominal system and some good Swadesh list matches, but not enough to establish regular sound correspondences. Sandawe is not related to Hadza, despite their proximity.
Khoe
The Khoe family is both the most numerous and diverse family of Khoisan languages, with seven living languages and over a quarter million speakers. Although little Kwadi data is available, proto-Khoe–Kwadi reconstructions have been made for pronouns and some basic vocabulary.
-
? Khoe–Kwadi
-
Kwadi language (extinct)
-
Khoe languages
-
Khoekhoe This branch appears to have been affected by the Kxʼa–Tuu sprachbund.
-
Nama language (ethnonyms Khoekhoen, Nama, Damara) (a dialect cluster including ǂAakhoe and Haiǁom)
-
Eini dialect (extinct)
-
South Khoekhoe
-
Tshu–Khwe (or Kalahari) Many of these languages have undergone partial click loss.
-
East Tshu–Khwe (East Kalahari)
-
Shua language (a dialect cluster including Deti, Tsʼixa, ǀXaise, and Ganádi)
-
Tsoa language (a dialect cluster including Cire Cire and Kua)
-
West Tshu–Khwe (West Kalahari)
-
Kxoe language (a dialect cluster including ǁAni and Buga)
-
Naro language (a dialect cluster, including ǂHaba)
-
Gǁana–Gǀwi (a dialect cluster including Gǁana and Gǀwi)
A Haiǁom language is listed in most Khoisan references. A century ago the Haiǁom people spoke a Ju dialect, probably close to ǃKung, but they now speak a divergent dialect of Nama. Thus their language is variously said to be extinct or to have 18,000 speakers, to be Ju or to be Khoe. (Their numbers have been included under Nama above.) They are known as the Saa by the Nama, and this is the source of the word San people.
Tuu
The Tuu family consists of two language clusters, which are related to each other at about the distance of Khoekhoe and Tshukhwe within Khoe. They are typologically very similar to the Kxʼa languages (below), but have not been demonstrated to be related to them genealogically (the similarities may be an Sprachbund feature).
-
Tuu
-
Taa
-
ǃXoon (4200 speakers. A dialect cluster.)
-
Lower Nossob (Two dialects, ǀʼAuni and ǀHaasi. Extinct.)
-
ǃKwi
-
Nǁng (1 speaker. A dialect cluster.)
-
ǀXam (A dialect cluster. Extinct.)
-
ǂUngkue (A dialect cluster. Extinct.)
-
ǁXegwi (Extinct.)
Kxʼa
The Kxʼa family is a relatively distant relationship formally demonstrated in 2010.[Honken, H. and Heine, B. 2010. "The Kxʼa Family: A New Khoisan Genealogy" . Journal of Asian and African Studies (Tokyo), 79, p. 5–36.]
-
Kxʼa
-
ǂʼAmkoe (200 speakers, Botswana. Moribund. A dialect cluster of Nǃaqriaxe, (Eastern) ǂHoan, and Sasi).
-
ǃKung (also ǃXun or Ju, formerly Northern Khoisan) is a dialect cluster. (~45,000 speakers.) Juǀʼhoan is the best-known dialect.
Classification by Starostin (2013)
Starostin (2013) gives the following classification of the Khoisan "macrofamily", which he considers to be a single coherent language family.[Starostin, Georgiy C. 2013. Языки Африки. Опыт построения лексикостатистической классификации. Т. 1: Методология. Койсанские языки / Languages of Africa: an attempt at a lexicostatistical classification. Volume 1: Methodology; Khoisan languages. Moscow: Языки славянской культуры / LRC Press. 510 p. ] However, this classification is not widely accepted.
-
Khoisan
-
Hadza language
-
Macro-Khoisan (excl. Hadza)
-
Sandawe–Khoe–Kwadi
-
Peripheral Khoisan
-
Tuu languages (= !Kwi–Taa ~ Tuu)
-
Ju–ǂHoan
-
Western ǂHoan
-
Northern Khoisan (= Ju)
In the tree on page 472, Starostin really writes "Western ǂHoan", which is a synonym for Taa language, but evidently means Eastern ǂHoan, that is, ǂʼAmkoe.
Other "click languages"
Not all languages using clicks as phonemes are considered Khoisan. Most others are neighboring Bantu languages in southern Africa: the Nguni languages (Xhosa language, Zulu language, Swazi language, Phuthi language, and Northern Ndebele); Sotho language; Yeyi language in Botswana; and Mbukushu, Kwangali, and Gciriku language in the Caprivi Strip. Clicks are spreading to a few additional neighboring languages. Of these languages, Xhosa, Zulu, Ndebele and Yeyi have intricate systems of click consonants; the others, despite the click in the name Gciriku, more rudimentary ones. There is also the South Cushitic language Dahalo language in Kenya, which has dental clicks in a few score words, and an extinct and presumably artificial Australian ritual language called Damin, which had only nasal clicks.
The Bantu languages adopted the use of clicks from neighboring, displaced, or absorbed Khoisan populations (or from other Bantu languages), often through intermarriage, while the Dahalo are thought to have retained clicks from an earlier language when they language shift to speaking a Cushitic language; if so, the pre-Dahalo language may have been something like Hadza or Sandawe. Damin is an invented ritual language, and has nothing to do with Khoisan.
These are the only languages known to have clicks in normal vocabulary. Occasionally other languages are said by laypeople to have "click" sounds. This is usually a misnomer for ejective consonants, which are found across much of the world, or is a reference to paralinguistic use of clicks such as English tsk! tsk!
Comparative vocabulary
Sample basic vocabulary for Khoisan language families:
! Language !! eye !! ear !! nose !! tooth !! tongue !! mouth !! blood !! bone !! tree !! water !! eat |
*/xʔon |
*/xʔon |
*ǀkx’on |
*ǀãe, *ǁae |
|
ǁʷâ |
seme |
See also
-
(Wiktionary)
-
Languages of Botswana
-
Languages of Namibia
Bibliography